WizardLM 2 8x22B vs StarCoder2 7B

Compare WizardLM 2 8x22B and StarCoder2 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Microsoft models All BigCode models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature WizardLM 2 8x22B StarCoder2 7B
CategoryOpen SourceCode
Parameters176B (22B active)7B
Context Window65K16K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~350ms~60ms

Choose WizardLM 2 8x22B when:

  • ✓ Complex instructions
  • ✓ Math tasks
  • ✓ Structured output
Key Strengths:

Strong instruction following, Good math, MoE efficient

Choose StarCoder2 7B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Quick generation
  • ✓ Editor integration
Key Strengths:

Open weights, Many languages, Fast

Verdict: WizardLM 2 8x22B vs StarCoder2 7B

For cost efficiency, StarCoder2 7B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, WizardLM 2 8x22B is faster at ~350ms. WizardLM 2 8x22B excels at Complex instructions while StarCoder2 7B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

WizardLM 2 8x22B costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. StarCoder2 7B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. StarCoder2 7B is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

WizardLM 2 8x22B has a 65K context window with ~350ms latency. StarCoder2 7B offers 16K context at ~60ms. WizardLM 2 8x22B has the larger context window.

Best For

WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source) is optimized for: Complex instructions, Math tasks, Structured output. StarCoder2 7B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Quick generation, Editor integration.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use WizardLM 2 8x22B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="wizardlm-2-8x22b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use StarCoder2 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="starcoder2-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, WizardLM 2 8x22B or StarCoder2 7B?

WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source, 176B (22B active)) offers Strong instruction following. StarCoder2 7B (Code, 7B) offers Open weights. Choose WizardLM 2 8x22B for Complex instructions or StarCoder2 7B for Code completion.

How much does WizardLM 2 8x22B cost vs StarCoder2 7B?

WizardLM 2 8x22B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. StarCoder2 7B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between WizardLM 2 8x22B and StarCoder2 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Vedika Code WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Gemma 3 27B WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Llama 4 Scout WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Llama 4 Maverick WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Llama 3.3 70B WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.