Vedika Vision vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare Vedika Vision and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Vedika Vision InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryVisionVision
Parameters26B78B
Context Window32K128K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.12/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~400ms

Choose Vedika Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Temple photo description
  • ✓ Vastu photo analysis
Key Strengths:

Chart image analysis, Yantra recognition, Sacred geometry

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: Vedika Vision vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, InternVL 2.5 78B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. Vedika Vision excels at Chart image analysis while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Vedika Vision costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.12/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. InternVL 2.5 78B is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Vedika Vision has a 32K context window with ~500ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. InternVL 2.5 78B has the larger context window.

Best For

Vedika Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Temple photo description, Vastu photo analysis. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Vedika Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="vedika-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Vedika Vision or InternVL 2.5 78B?

Vedika Vision (Vision, 26B) offers Chart image analysis. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose Vedika Vision for Chart image analysis or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does Vedika Vision cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

Vedika Vision: $0.08/1M input, $0.12/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Vedika Vision and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Vedika Vision vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Vedika Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Vedika Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Vedika Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Vedika Vision vs Pixtral Large Vedika Vision vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.