Vedika Pro Ultra vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
Compare Vedika Pro Ultra and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Vedika Pro Ultra | Qwen 2.5 VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Domain Specialist | Vision |
| Parameters | 120B | 72B |
| Context Window | 256K | 128K |
| Input Price | $0.12/1M tokens | $0.05/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~600ms | ~400ms |
Choose Vedika Pro Ultra when:
- ✓ Kundali matching reports
- ✓ Multi-chart analysis
- ✓ Enterprise platforms
256K context, Deep yoga reasoning, Multi-system comparison
Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:
- ✓ Document analysis
- ✓ Chart reading
- ✓ Visual Q&A
Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning
Verdict: Vedika Pro Ultra vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Vedika Pro Ultra excels at Kundali matching reports while Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Vedika Pro Ultra costs $0.12/1M input tokens and $0.20/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 2.4x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Vedika Pro Ultra has a 256K context window with ~600ms latency. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Vedika Pro Ultra has the larger context window.
Best For
Vedika Pro Ultra (Domain Specialist) is optimized for: Kundali matching reports, Multi-chart analysis, Enterprise platforms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Vedika Pro Ultra
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="vedika-pro-ultra",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Vedika Pro Ultra or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?
Vedika Pro Ultra (Domain Specialist, 120B) offers 256K context. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Choose Vedika Pro Ultra for Kundali matching reports or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis.
How much does Vedika Pro Ultra cost vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?
Vedika Pro Ultra: $0.12/1M input, $0.20/1M output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Vedika Pro Ultra and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.