Vedika Pro Ultra vs Llama 3.1 405B

Compare Vedika Pro Ultra and Llama 3.1 405B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Vedika Pro Ultra Llama 3.1 405B
CategoryDomain SpecialistOpen Source
Parameters120B405B
Context Window256K128K
Input Price$0.12/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.14/1M tokens
Latency~600ms~600ms

Choose Vedika Pro Ultra when:

  • ✓ Kundali matching reports
  • ✓ Multi-chart analysis
  • ✓ Enterprise platforms
Key Strengths:

256K context, Deep yoga reasoning, Multi-system comparison

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • ✓ Premium tasks
  • ✓ Research
  • ✓ Fine-tuning base
Key Strengths:

Largest open model, Highest open-source quality

Verdict: Vedika Pro Ultra vs Llama 3.1 405B

For cost efficiency, Llama 3.1 405B wins at $0.08/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 3.1 405B is faster at ~600ms. Vedika Pro Ultra excels at Kundali matching reports while Llama 3.1 405B is better for Premium tasks. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Vedika Pro Ultra costs $0.12/1M input tokens and $0.20/1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 405B costs $0.08 input and $0.14 output. Llama 3.1 405B is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Vedika Pro Ultra has a 256K context window with ~600ms latency. Llama 3.1 405B offers 128K context at ~600ms. Vedika Pro Ultra has the larger context window.

Best For

Vedika Pro Ultra (Domain Specialist) is optimized for: Kundali matching reports, Multi-chart analysis, Enterprise platforms. Llama 3.1 405B (Open Source) works best for: Premium tasks, Research, Fine-tuning base.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Vedika Pro Ultra
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="vedika-pro-ultra",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.1 405B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-1-405b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Vedika Pro Ultra or Llama 3.1 405B?

Vedika Pro Ultra (Domain Specialist, 120B) offers 256K context. Llama 3.1 405B (Open Source, 405B) offers Largest open model. Choose Vedika Pro Ultra for Kundali matching reports or Llama 3.1 405B for Premium tasks.

How much does Vedika Pro Ultra cost vs Llama 3.1 405B?

Vedika Pro Ultra: $0.12/1M input, $0.20/1M output. Llama 3.1 405B: $0.08/1M input, $0.14/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Vedika Pro Ultra and Llama 3.1 405B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Vedika Pro Ultra vs Vedika Standard Vedika Pro Ultra vs Vedika Fast Vedika Pro Ultra vs Gemma 3 27B Vedika Pro Ultra vs Llama 4 Scout Vedika Pro Ultra vs Llama 4 Maverick Vedika Pro Ultra vs Llama 3.3 70B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.