Vedika Astro Agent vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Compare Vedika Astro Agent and Llama 3.2 90B Vision: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Vedika Astro Agent Llama 3.2 90B Vision
CategoryAgentVision
ParametersMulti-model90B
Context Window256K128K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Output Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~1000ms~500ms

Choose Vedika Astro Agent when:

  • ✓ Full astrology Q&A
  • ✓ Chart analysis
  • ✓ Report generation
Key Strengths:

Multi-step reasoning, Built-in calculations, Auto-citation

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Verdict: Vedika Astro Agent vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

For cost efficiency, Llama 3.2 90B Vision wins at $0.06/1M input tokens. For speed, Vedika Astro Agent is faster at ~1000ms. Vedika Astro Agent excels at Full astrology Q&A while Llama 3.2 90B Vision is better for Chart image analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Vedika Astro Agent costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.15/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06 input and $0.10 output. Llama 3.2 90B Vision is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Vedika Astro Agent has a 256K context window with ~1000ms latency. Llama 3.2 90B Vision offers 128K context at ~500ms. Vedika Astro Agent has the larger context window.

Best For

Vedika Astro Agent (Agent) is optimized for: Full astrology Q&A, Chart analysis, Report generation. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) works best for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Vedika Astro Agent
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="vedika-astro-agent",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Vedika Astro Agent or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Vedika Astro Agent (Agent, Multi-model) offers Multi-step reasoning. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Choose Vedika Astro Agent for Full astrology Q&A or Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis.

How much does Vedika Astro Agent cost vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Vedika Astro Agent: $0.08/1M input, $0.15/1M output. Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Vedika Astro Agent and Llama 3.2 90B Vision by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Vedika Astro Agent vs Vedika Vision Vedika Astro Agent vs Vedika Temple Agent Vedika Astro Agent vs Vedika Content Agent Vedika Astro Agent vs Vedika Voice Agent Vedika Astro Agent vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Vedika Astro Agent vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.