StarCoder2 15B vs Llama Guard 3 8B

Compare StarCoder2 15B and Llama Guard 3 8B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All BigCode models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature StarCoder2 15B Llama Guard 3 8B
CategoryCodeSafety
Parameters15B8B
Context Window16K128K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~150ms~60ms

Choose StarCoder2 15B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Code generation
  • ✓ Bug fixing
Key Strengths:

Strong coding, 600+ languages, Open weights

Choose Llama Guard 3 8B when:

  • ✓ Content moderation
  • ✓ Safety filtering
  • ✓ Input validation
Key Strengths:

Safety classification, Fast, Open weights

Verdict: StarCoder2 15B vs Llama Guard 3 8B

For cost efficiency, Llama Guard 3 8B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, StarCoder2 15B is faster at ~150ms. StarCoder2 15B excels at Code completion while Llama Guard 3 8B is better for Content moderation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

StarCoder2 15B costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.03/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 3 8B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Llama Guard 3 8B is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

StarCoder2 15B has a 16K context window with ~150ms latency. Llama Guard 3 8B offers 128K context at ~60ms. Llama Guard 3 8B has the larger context window.

Best For

StarCoder2 15B (Code) is optimized for: Code completion, Code generation, Bug fixing. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety) works best for: Content moderation, Safety filtering, Input validation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use StarCoder2 15B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="starcoder2-15b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama Guard 3 8B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-guard-3-8b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, StarCoder2 15B or Llama Guard 3 8B?

StarCoder2 15B (Code, 15B) offers Strong coding. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety, 8B) offers Safety classification. Choose StarCoder2 15B for Code completion or Llama Guard 3 8B for Content moderation.

How much does StarCoder2 15B cost vs Llama Guard 3 8B?

StarCoder2 15B: $0.02/1M input, $0.03/1M output. Llama Guard 3 8B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between StarCoder2 15B and Llama Guard 3 8B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

StarCoder2 15B vs Vedika Code StarCoder2 15B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 StarCoder2 15B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B StarCoder2 15B vs Codestral StarCoder2 15B vs CodeGemma 7B StarCoder2 15B vs StarCoder2 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.