StarCoder2 15B vs Command A

Compare StarCoder2 15B and Command A: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All BigCode models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature StarCoder2 15B Command A
CategoryCodeEnterprise
Parameters15B111B (37B active)
Context Window16K256K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.025/1M tokens
Output Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~150ms~300ms

Choose StarCoder2 15B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Code generation
  • ✓ Bug fixing
Key Strengths:

Strong coding, 600+ languages, Open weights

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Verdict: StarCoder2 15B vs Command A

For cost efficiency, StarCoder2 15B wins at $0.02/1M input tokens. For speed, StarCoder2 15B is faster at ~150ms. StarCoder2 15B excels at Code completion while Command A is better for Enterprise RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

StarCoder2 15B costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.03/1M output tokens. Command A costs $0.025 input and $0.10 output. StarCoder2 15B is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

StarCoder2 15B has a 16K context window with ~150ms latency. Command A offers 256K context at ~300ms. Command A has the larger context window.

Best For

StarCoder2 15B (Code) is optimized for: Code completion, Code generation, Bug fixing. Command A (Enterprise) works best for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use StarCoder2 15B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="starcoder2-15b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Command A
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, StarCoder2 15B or Command A?

StarCoder2 15B (Code, 15B) offers Strong coding. Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. Choose StarCoder2 15B for Code completion or Command A for Enterprise RAG.

How much does StarCoder2 15B cost vs Command A?

StarCoder2 15B: $0.02/1M input, $0.03/1M output. Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between StarCoder2 15B and Command A by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

StarCoder2 15B vs Vedika Code StarCoder2 15B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 StarCoder2 15B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B StarCoder2 15B vs Codestral StarCoder2 15B vs Command R+ StarCoder2 15B vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.