Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Cohere Rerank 3.5 Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryRerankingOpen Source
Parameters~600M32B
Context Window4K128K
Input Price$0.002/search/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~25ms~250ms

Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 when:

  • ✓ Search reranking
  • ✓ RAG improvement
  • ✓ Result quality
Key Strengths:

Higher quality, Multilingual, Fast

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Cohere Rerank 3.5 wins at $0.002/search/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Cohere Rerank 3.5 excels at Search reranking while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Cohere Rerank 3.5 costs $0.002/search/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 15.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Cohere Rerank 3.5 has a 4K context window with ~25ms latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking) is optimized for: Search reranking, RAG improvement, Result quality. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Cohere Rerank 3.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="rerank-v3-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cohere Rerank 3.5 or Aya Expanse 32B?

Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking, ~600M) offers Higher quality. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 for Search reranking or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does Cohere Rerank 3.5 cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

Cohere Rerank 3.5: $0.002/search/1M input, N/A/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Gemma 3 27B Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Llama 4 Scout Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Llama 3.1 405B Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.