QwQ 32B vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B

Compare QwQ 32B and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Cognitive Computations models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature QwQ 32B Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
CategoryReasoningOpen Source
Parameters32B72B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~350ms

Choose QwQ 32B when:

  • ✓ Math reasoning
  • ✓ Logic tasks
  • ✓ Analysis
Key Strengths:

Strong reasoning, Compact for reasoning, Cost-efficient

Choose Dolphin 2.9.3 72B when:

  • ✓ Creative writing
  • ✓ Unrestricted generation
  • ✓ Research
Key Strengths:

Uncensored, Strong instruction following, Versatile

Verdict: QwQ 32B vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B

For cost efficiency, QwQ 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is faster at ~350ms. QwQ 32B excels at Math reasoning while Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is better for Creative writing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

QwQ 32B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. QwQ 32B is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

QwQ 32B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B offers 128K context at ~350ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

QwQ 32B (Reasoning) is optimized for: Math reasoning, Logic tasks, Analysis. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source) works best for: Creative writing, Unrestricted generation, Research.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use QwQ 32B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwq-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dolphin-2-9-3-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, QwQ 32B or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?

QwQ 32B (Reasoning, 32B) offers Strong reasoning. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source, 72B) offers Uncensored. Choose QwQ 32B for Math reasoning or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B for Creative writing.

How much does QwQ 32B cost vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?

QwQ 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between QwQ 32B and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

QwQ 32B vs o3 QwQ 32B vs o3 Mini QwQ 32B vs o4-mini QwQ 32B vs Gemma 3 27B QwQ 32B vs Llama 4 Scout QwQ 32B vs Llama 4 Maverick

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.