Qwen 3 235B vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Qwen 3 235B and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 3 235B Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryOpen SourceEmbedding
Parameters235B (22B active)137M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~350ms~10ms

Choose Qwen 3 235B when:

  • ✓ Pan-India multilingual
  • ✓ Regional chatbots
  • ✓ Translation
Key Strengths:

Exceptional Asian languages, Strong Hindi/Bengali/Tamil, MoE efficiency

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Qwen 3 235B vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Qwen 3 235B excels at Pan-India multilingual while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 3 235B costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 60.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 3 235B has a 128K context window with ~350ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Qwen 3 235B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 3 235B (Open Source) is optimized for: Pan-India multilingual, Regional chatbots, Translation. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 3 235B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-3-235b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 3 235B or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Qwen 3 235B (Open Source, 235B (22B active)) offers Exceptional Asian languages. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Qwen 3 235B for Pan-India multilingual or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Qwen 3 235B cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Qwen 3 235B: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 3 235B and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 3 235B vs Text Embedding 3 Large Qwen 3 235B vs Gemma 3 27B Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 Maverick Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.