Qwen 3 235B vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
Compare Qwen 3 235B and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Qwen 3 235B | FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Open Source | Image |
| Parameters | 235B (22B active) | ~30B |
| Context Window | 128K | N/A |
| Input Price | $0.06/1M tokens | $0.06/image/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.10/1M tokens | N/A/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~350ms | ~6s |
Choose Qwen 3 235B when:
- ✓ Pan-India multilingual
- ✓ Regional chatbots
- ✓ Translation
Exceptional Asian languages, Strong Hindi/Bengali/Tamil, MoE efficiency
Choose FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra when:
- ✓ Print-quality imagery
- ✓ Ultra-HD content
- ✓ Professional art
Ultra quality, 4K output, Best detail
Verdict: Qwen 3 235B vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
For cost efficiency, FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra wins at $0.06/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 3 235B is faster at ~350ms. Qwen 3 235B excels at Pan-India multilingual while FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra is better for Print-quality imagery. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Qwen 3 235B costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra costs $0.06/image input and N/A output. Both models are similarly priced. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Qwen 3 235B has a 128K context window with ~350ms latency. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra offers N/A context at ~6s. Qwen 3 235B has the larger context window.
Best For
Qwen 3 235B (Open Source) is optimized for: Pan-India multilingual, Regional chatbots, Translation. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image) works best for: Print-quality imagery, Ultra-HD content, Professional art.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Qwen 3 235B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="qwen-3-235b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="flux-1-1-pro-ultra",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Qwen 3 235B or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?
Qwen 3 235B (Open Source, 235B (22B active)) offers Exceptional Asian languages. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image, ~30B) offers Ultra quality. Choose Qwen 3 235B for Pan-India multilingual or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra for Print-quality imagery.
How much does Qwen 3 235B cost vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?
Qwen 3 235B: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: $0.06/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 3 235B and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.