Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 7B and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Cognitive Computations models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
CategoryVisionOpen Source
Parameters7B72B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.01/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~150ms~350ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 7B when:

  • ✓ Budget image analysis
  • ✓ Simple OCR
  • ✓ Quick visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Asian language OCR, Fast

Choose Dolphin 2.9.3 72B when:

  • ✓ Creative writing
  • ✓ Unrestricted generation
  • ✓ Research
Key Strengths:

Uncensored, Strong instruction following, Versatile

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is faster at ~150ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B excels at Budget image analysis while Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is better for Creative writing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B costs $0.01/1M input tokens and $0.02/1M output tokens. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B has a 128K context window with ~150ms latency. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B offers 128K context at ~350ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Vision) is optimized for: Budget image analysis, Simple OCR, Quick visual Q&A. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source) works best for: Creative writing, Unrestricted generation, Research.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 7B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dolphin-2-9-3-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Vision, 7B) offers Low cost vision. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source, 72B) offers Uncensored. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 7B for Budget image analysis or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B for Creative writing.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 7B cost vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 7B and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Gemma 3 27B Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Llama 4 Maverick Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 2.5 VL 7B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.