Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Yi Lightning

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Yi Lightning: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All 01.AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Yi Lightning
CategoryVisionOpen Source
Parameters72B200B MoE
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~300ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Yi Lightning when:

  • ✓ High-volume APIs
  • ✓ Fast Q&A
  • ✓ Real-time chatbots
Key Strengths:

Fast inference, Good multilingual, Strong reasoning

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Yi Lightning

For cost efficiency, Yi Lightning wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Yi Lightning is faster at ~300ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Yi Lightning is better for High-volume APIs. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Yi Lightning costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Yi Lightning is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Yi Lightning offers 128K context at ~300ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Yi Lightning (Open Source) works best for: High-volume APIs, Fast Q&A, Real-time chatbots.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Yi Lightning
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="yi-lightning",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Yi Lightning?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Yi Lightning (Open Source, 200B MoE) offers Fast inference. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Yi Lightning for High-volume APIs.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Yi Lightning?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Yi Lightning: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Yi Lightning by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemma 3 27B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 4 Maverick Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.