Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Voyage Large 2

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Voyage Large 2: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Voyage AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Voyage Large 2
CategoryVisionEmbedding
Parameters72B~500M
Context Window128K16K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.002/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~25ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Voyage Large 2 when:

  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Long document RAG
  • ✓ Semantic matching
Key Strengths:

16K context, High quality, Good for code

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Voyage Large 2

For cost efficiency, Voyage Large 2 wins at $0.002/1M input tokens. For speed, Voyage Large 2 is faster at ~25ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Voyage Large 2 is better for Code search. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Voyage Large 2 costs $0.002 input and N/A output. Voyage Large 2 is 25.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Voyage Large 2 offers 16K context at ~25ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Voyage Large 2 (Embedding) works best for: Code search, Long document RAG, Semantic matching.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Voyage Large 2
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="voyage-large-2",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Voyage Large 2?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Voyage Large 2 (Embedding, ~500M) offers 16K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Voyage Large 2 for Code search.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Voyage Large 2?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Voyage Large 2: $0.002/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Voyage Large 2 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Text Embedding 3 Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.