Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs StarCoder2 15B

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and StarCoder2 15B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All BigCode models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B StarCoder2 15B
CategoryVisionCode
Parameters72B15B
Context Window128K16K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~150ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose StarCoder2 15B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Code generation
  • ✓ Bug fixing
Key Strengths:

Strong coding, 600+ languages, Open weights

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs StarCoder2 15B

For cost efficiency, StarCoder2 15B wins at $0.02/1M input tokens. For speed, StarCoder2 15B is faster at ~150ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while StarCoder2 15B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. StarCoder2 15B costs $0.02 input and $0.03 output. StarCoder2 15B is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. StarCoder2 15B offers 16K context at ~150ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. StarCoder2 15B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Code generation, Bug fixing.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use StarCoder2 15B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="starcoder2-15b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or StarCoder2 15B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. StarCoder2 15B (Code, 15B) offers Strong coding. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or StarCoder2 15B for Code completion.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs StarCoder2 15B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. StarCoder2 15B: $0.02/1M input, $0.03/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and StarCoder2 15B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Code Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.