Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Runway Gen-3 Alpha

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Runway Gen-3 Alpha: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Runway models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Runway Gen-3 Alpha
CategoryVisionVideo
Parameters72B~8B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.25/video/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~45s

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Runway Gen-3 Alpha when:

  • ✓ Film production
  • ✓ Advertising
  • ✓ Content creation
Key Strengths:

Cinematic quality, Good control, Professional

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Runway Gen-3 Alpha

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Runway Gen-3 Alpha is better for Film production. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Runway Gen-3 Alpha costs $0.25/video input and N/A output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Runway Gen-3 Alpha offers N/A context at ~45s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Runway Gen-3 Alpha (Video) works best for: Film production, Advertising, Content creation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Runway Gen-3 Alpha
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="runway-gen3-alpha",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Runway Gen-3 Alpha?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Runway Gen-3 Alpha (Video, ~8B) offers Cinematic quality. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Runway Gen-3 Alpha for Film production.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Runway Gen-3 Alpha?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Runway Gen-3 Alpha: $0.25/video/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Runway Gen-3 Alpha by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.