Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs QwQ 32B

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and QwQ 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B QwQ 32B
CategoryVisionReasoning
Parameters72B32B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~400ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose QwQ 32B when:

  • ✓ Math reasoning
  • ✓ Logic tasks
  • ✓ Analysis
Key Strengths:

Strong reasoning, Compact for reasoning, Cost-efficient

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs QwQ 32B

For cost efficiency, QwQ 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, QwQ 32B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while QwQ 32B is better for Math reasoning. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. QwQ 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. QwQ 32B is 1.7x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. QwQ 32B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. QwQ 32B (Reasoning) works best for: Math reasoning, Logic tasks, Analysis.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use QwQ 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwq-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or QwQ 32B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. QwQ 32B (Reasoning, 32B) offers Strong reasoning. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or QwQ 32B for Math reasoning.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs QwQ 32B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. QwQ 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and QwQ 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs o3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs o3 Mini Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs o4-mini Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.