Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Qwen 2.5 VL 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Qwen 2.5 VL 7B
CategoryVisionVision
Parameters72B7B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~150ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 7B when:

  • ✓ Budget image analysis
  • ✓ Simple OCR
  • ✓ Quick visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Asian language OCR, Fast

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is faster at ~150ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is better for Budget image analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B offers 128K context at ~150ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Vision) works best for: Budget image analysis, Simple OCR, Quick visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Qwen 2.5 VL 7B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Vision, 7B) offers Low cost vision. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Qwen 2.5 VL 7B for Budget image analysis.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Qwen 2.5 VL 7B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Qwen 2.5 VL 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral 12B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.