Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Mistral Small 3.1

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Mistral Small 3.1: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Mistral models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Mistral Small 3.1
CategoryVisionCompact
Parameters72B24B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~120ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 when:

  • ✓ Lightweight tasks
  • ✓ Classification
  • ✓ Simple generation
Key Strengths:

128K context, Low cost, Fast

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Mistral Small 3.1

For cost efficiency, Mistral Small 3.1 wins at $0.02/1M input tokens. For speed, Mistral Small 3.1 is faster at ~120ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Mistral Small 3.1 is better for Lightweight tasks. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 costs $0.02 input and $0.04 output. Mistral Small 3.1 is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Mistral Small 3.1 offers 128K context at ~120ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Mistral Small 3.1 (Compact) works best for: Lightweight tasks, Classification, Simple generation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Mistral Small 3.1
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="mistral-small-3-1",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Mistral Small 3.1?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Mistral Small 3.1 (Compact, 24B) offers 128K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Mistral Small 3.1 for Lightweight tasks.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Mistral Small 3.1?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Mistral Small 3.1: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Mistral Small 3.1 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4.1 Nano Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4o Mini Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemma 3 12B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.