Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Jamba 1.5 Mini: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All AI21 models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Jamba 1.5 Mini
CategoryVisionCompact
Parameters72B52B (12B active)
Context Window128K256K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~200ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini when:

  • ✓ Long document Q&A
  • ✓ Budget apps
  • ✓ Summarization
Key Strengths:

256K context, Low cost, SSM efficiency

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

For cost efficiency, Jamba 1.5 Mini wins at $0.02/1M input tokens. For speed, Jamba 1.5 Mini is faster at ~200ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Jamba 1.5 Mini is better for Long document Q&A. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini costs $0.02 input and $0.04 output. Jamba 1.5 Mini is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 256K context at ~200ms. Jamba 1.5 Mini has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Jamba 1.5 Mini (Compact) works best for: Long document Q&A, Budget apps, Summarization.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Jamba 1.5 Mini
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="jamba-1-5-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Jamba 1.5 Mini (Compact, 52B (12B active)) offers 256K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Jamba 1.5 Mini for Long document Q&A.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Jamba 1.5 Mini: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Jamba 1.5 Mini by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4.1 Nano Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4o Mini Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemma 3 12B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.