Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Jamba 1.5 Large: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All AI21 models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Jamba 1.5 Large
CategoryVisionEnterprise
Parameters72B398B (94B active)
Context Window128K256K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.14/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~500ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large when:

  • ✓ Full text processing
  • ✓ Comprehensive reports
  • ✓ Long analysis
Key Strengths:

256K context, SSM-Transformer hybrid, Good summarization

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Jamba 1.5 Large

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Jamba 1.5 Large is better for Full text processing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $0.08 input and $0.14 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 256K context at ~500ms. Jamba 1.5 Large has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise) works best for: Full text processing, Comprehensive reports, Long analysis.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Jamba 1.5 Large
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="jamba-1-5-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Jamba 1.5 Large?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise, 398B (94B active)) offers 256K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Jamba 1.5 Large for Full text processing.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Jamba 1.5 Large?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Jamba 1.5 Large: $0.08/1M input, $0.14/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Jamba 1.5 Large by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.