Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Ideogram V3

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Ideogram V3: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Ideogram models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Ideogram V3
CategoryVisionImage
Parameters72B~3B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.004/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~3s

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Ideogram V3 when:

  • ✓ Temple banners with text
  • ✓ Festival graphics
  • ✓ Devotional posters
Key Strengths:

Best text rendering, Accurate scripts, Multiple styles

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Ideogram V3

For cost efficiency, Ideogram V3 wins at $0.004/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Ideogram V3 is faster at ~3s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Ideogram V3 is better for Temple banners with text. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Ideogram V3 costs $0.004/image input and N/A output. Ideogram V3 is 12.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Ideogram V3 offers N/A context at ~3s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Ideogram V3 (Image) works best for: Temple banners with text, Festival graphics, Devotional posters.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Ideogram V3
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="ideogram-v3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Ideogram V3?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Ideogram V3 (Image, ~3B) offers Best text rendering. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Ideogram V3 for Temple banners with text.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Ideogram V3?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Ideogram V3: $0.004/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Ideogram V3 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DALL-E 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Imagen 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.