Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Google models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview
CategoryVisionFrontier
Parameters72B~1.5T
Context Window128K2M
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.07/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.21/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~700ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview when:

  • ✓ Research
  • ✓ Long analysis
  • ✓ Testing new capabilities
Key Strengths:

2M context, Experimental features, Strong reasoning

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview is better for Research. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview costs $0.07 input and $0.21 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview offers 2M context at ~700ms. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Frontier) works best for: Research, Long analysis, Testing new capabilities.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemini-2-5-pro-preview",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Frontier, ~1.5T) offers 2M context. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview for Research.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview: $0.07/1M input, $0.21/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4.1 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4.1 Mini Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs GPT-4o Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Claude Opus 4 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Claude Sonnet 4

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.