Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs FLUX.1 Dev

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and FLUX.1 Dev: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Black Forest Labs models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B FLUX.1 Dev
CategoryVisionImage
Parameters72B12B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.003/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~3s

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose FLUX.1 Dev when:

  • ✓ Custom styles
  • ✓ Fine-tuned imagery
  • ✓ Development
Key Strengths:

Fine-tunable, Good quality, Open weights

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs FLUX.1 Dev

For cost efficiency, FLUX.1 Dev wins at $0.003/image/1M input tokens. For speed, FLUX.1 Dev is faster at ~3s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while FLUX.1 Dev is better for Custom styles. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. FLUX.1 Dev costs $0.003/image input and N/A output. FLUX.1 Dev is 16.7x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. FLUX.1 Dev offers N/A context at ~3s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. FLUX.1 Dev (Image) works best for: Custom styles, Fine-tuned imagery, Development.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use FLUX.1 Dev
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="flux-1-dev",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or FLUX.1 Dev?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. FLUX.1 Dev (Image, 12B) offers Fine-tunable. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or FLUX.1 Dev for Custom styles.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs FLUX.1 Dev?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. FLUX.1 Dev: $0.003/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and FLUX.1 Dev by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DALL-E 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Imagen 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.