Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Black Forest Labs models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
CategoryVisionImage
Parameters72B~30B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.06/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~6s

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra when:

  • ✓ Print-quality imagery
  • ✓ Ultra-HD content
  • ✓ Professional art
Key Strengths:

Ultra quality, 4K output, Best detail

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra is better for Print-quality imagery. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra costs $0.06/image input and N/A output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra offers N/A context at ~6s. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image) works best for: Print-quality imagery, Ultra-HD content, Professional art.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="flux-1-1-pro-ultra",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image, ~30B) offers Ultra quality. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra for Print-quality imagery.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: $0.06/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DALL-E 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Imagen 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.