Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DBRX

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and DBRX: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Databricks models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B DBRX
CategoryVisionEnterprise
Parameters72B132B (36B active)
Context Window128K32K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~300ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose DBRX when:

  • ✓ Data pipelines
  • ✓ Analytics
  • ✓ Enterprise workflows
Key Strengths:

MoE efficient, Good for data, Enterprise-grade

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DBRX

For cost efficiency, DBRX wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, DBRX is faster at ~300ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while DBRX is better for Data pipelines. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. DBRX costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. DBRX is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. DBRX offers 32K context at ~300ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. DBRX (Enterprise) works best for: Data pipelines, Analytics, Enterprise workflows.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use DBRX
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dbrx",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or DBRX?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. DBRX (Enterprise, 132B (36B active)) offers MoE efficient. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or DBRX for Data pipelines.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs DBRX?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. DBRX: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and DBRX by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.