Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs CodeGemma 7B

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and CodeGemma 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Google models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B CodeGemma 7B
CategoryVisionCode
Parameters72B7B
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~60ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose CodeGemma 7B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Simple generation
  • ✓ Editor plugins
Key Strengths:

Compact, Fast code completion, Open weights

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs CodeGemma 7B

For cost efficiency, CodeGemma 7B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while CodeGemma 7B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. CodeGemma 7B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. CodeGemma 7B is 6.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. CodeGemma 7B offers 8K context at ~60ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. CodeGemma 7B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Simple generation, Editor plugins.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use CodeGemma 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codegemma-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or CodeGemma 7B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. CodeGemma 7B (Code, 7B) offers Compact. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or CodeGemma 7B for Code completion.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs CodeGemma 7B?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. CodeGemma 7B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and CodeGemma 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Code Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.