Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Arctic Large

Compare Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Arctic Large: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Snowflake models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Arctic Large
CategoryVisionEnterprise
Parameters72B480B (17B active)
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~400ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Choose Arctic Large when:

  • ✓ Data analysis
  • ✓ SQL generation
  • ✓ Business intelligence
Key Strengths:

Strong SQL, Data analysis, Enterprise features

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Arctic Large

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Arctic Large is faster at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B excels at Document analysis while Arctic Large is better for Data analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Arctic Large costs $0.06 input and $0.10 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Arctic Large offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Arctic Large (Enterprise) works best for: Data analysis, SQL generation, Business intelligence.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Arctic Large
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="arctic-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B or Arctic Large?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Arctic Large (Enterprise, 480B (17B active)) offers Strong SQL. Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis or Arctic Large for Data analysis.

How much does Qwen 2.5 VL 72B cost vs Arctic Large?

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Arctic Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 VL 72B and Arctic Large by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Vedika Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral Large Qwen 2.5 VL 72B vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.