Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Alibaba models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryOpen SourceEmbedding
Parameters72B137M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~10ms

Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo when:

  • ✓ Pan-India apps
  • ✓ Multilingual Q&A
  • ✓ Content generation
Key Strengths:

Strong Asian languages, Good reasoning, Fast inference

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo excels at Pan-India apps while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 40.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo has a 128K context window with ~300ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo has the larger context window.

Best For

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source) is optimized for: Pan-India apps, Multilingual Q&A, Content generation. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-72b-turbo",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source, 72B) offers Strong Asian languages. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo for Pan-India apps or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Text Embedding 3 Large Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Gemma 3 27B Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Llama 4 Maverick Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.