Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Jamba 1.5 Large
Compare Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo and Jamba 1.5 Large: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo | Jamba 1.5 Large |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Open Source | Enterprise |
| Parameters | 72B | 398B (94B active) |
| Context Window | 128K | 256K |
| Input Price | $0.04/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.08/1M tokens | $0.14/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~300ms | ~500ms |
Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo when:
- ✓ Pan-India apps
- ✓ Multilingual Q&A
- ✓ Content generation
Strong Asian languages, Good reasoning, Fast inference
Choose Jamba 1.5 Large when:
- ✓ Full text processing
- ✓ Comprehensive reports
- ✓ Long analysis
256K context, SSM-Transformer hybrid, Good summarization
Verdict: Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo vs Jamba 1.5 Large
For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo is faster at ~300ms. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo excels at Pan-India apps while Jamba 1.5 Large is better for Full text processing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $0.08 input and $0.14 output. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo has a 128K context window with ~300ms latency. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 256K context at ~500ms. Jamba 1.5 Large has the larger context window.
Best For
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source) is optimized for: Pan-India apps, Multilingual Q&A, Content generation. Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise) works best for: Full text processing, Comprehensive reports, Long analysis.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="qwen-2-5-72b-turbo",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use Jamba 1.5 Large
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="jamba-1-5-large",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo or Jamba 1.5 Large?
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source, 72B) offers Strong Asian languages. Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise, 398B (94B active)) offers 256K context. Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo for Pan-India apps or Jamba 1.5 Large for Full text processing.
How much does Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo cost vs Jamba 1.5 Large?
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Jamba 1.5 Large: $0.08/1M input, $0.14/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo and Jamba 1.5 Large by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.