Pixtral Large vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

Compare Pixtral Large and Cohere Rerank 3.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Pixtral Large Cohere Rerank 3.5
CategoryVisionReranking
Parameters124B~600M
Context Window128K4K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.002/search/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~450ms~25ms

Choose Pixtral Large when:

  • ✓ Image analysis
  • ✓ Document understanding
  • ✓ Chart reading
Key Strengths:

Strong vision, Good reasoning, Multilingual

Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 when:

  • ✓ Search reranking
  • ✓ RAG improvement
  • ✓ Result quality
Key Strengths:

Higher quality, Multilingual, Fast

Verdict: Pixtral Large vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

For cost efficiency, Cohere Rerank 3.5 wins at $0.002/search/1M input tokens. For speed, Cohere Rerank 3.5 is faster at ~25ms. Pixtral Large excels at Image analysis while Cohere Rerank 3.5 is better for Search reranking. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Pixtral Large costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Cohere Rerank 3.5 costs $0.002/search input and N/A output. Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 30.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Pixtral Large has a 128K context window with ~450ms latency. Cohere Rerank 3.5 offers 4K context at ~25ms. Pixtral Large has the larger context window.

Best For

Pixtral Large (Vision) is optimized for: Image analysis, Document understanding, Chart reading. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking) works best for: Search reranking, RAG improvement, Result quality.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Pixtral Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="pixtral-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Cohere Rerank 3.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="rerank-v3-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral Large or Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Pixtral Large (Vision, 124B) offers Strong vision. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking, ~600M) offers Higher quality. Choose Pixtral Large for Image analysis or Cohere Rerank 3.5 for Search reranking.

How much does Pixtral Large cost vs Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Pixtral Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Cohere Rerank 3.5: $0.002/search/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Pixtral Large and Cohere Rerank 3.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Pixtral Large vs Vedika Vision Pixtral Large vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Pixtral Large vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Pixtral Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Pixtral Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Pixtral Large vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.