Pixtral Large vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Pixtral Large and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Pixtral Large Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryVisionEmbedding
Parameters124B137M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~450ms~10ms

Choose Pixtral Large when:

  • ✓ Image analysis
  • ✓ Document understanding
  • ✓ Chart reading
Key Strengths:

Strong vision, Good reasoning, Multilingual

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Pixtral Large vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Pixtral Large excels at Image analysis while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Pixtral Large costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 60.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Pixtral Large has a 128K context window with ~450ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Pixtral Large has the larger context window.

Best For

Pixtral Large (Vision) is optimized for: Image analysis, Document understanding, Chart reading. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Pixtral Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="pixtral-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral Large or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Pixtral Large (Vision, 124B) offers Strong vision. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Pixtral Large for Image analysis or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Pixtral Large cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Pixtral Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Pixtral Large and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Pixtral Large vs Vedika Vision Pixtral Large vs Text Embedding 3 Large Pixtral Large vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Pixtral Large vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Pixtral Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Pixtral Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.