Pixtral 12B vs Text Embedding 3 Small

Compare Pixtral 12B and Text Embedding 3 Small: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All OpenAI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Pixtral 12B Text Embedding 3 Small
CategoryVisionEmbedding
Parameters12B~200M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.0002/1M tokens
Output Price$0.04/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~10ms

Choose Pixtral 12B when:

  • ✓ Simple image tasks
  • ✓ Classification
  • ✓ OCR
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Fast, Compact

Choose Text Embedding 3 Small when:

  • ✓ Budget RAG
  • ✓ High-volume embedding
  • ✓ Simple search
Key Strengths:

Cheapest embedding, Very fast, Good quality for price

Verdict: Pixtral 12B vs Text Embedding 3 Small

For cost efficiency, Text Embedding 3 Small wins at $0.0002/1M input tokens. For speed, Text Embedding 3 Small is faster at ~10ms. Pixtral 12B excels at Simple image tasks while Text Embedding 3 Small is better for Budget RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Pixtral 12B costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Text Embedding 3 Small costs $0.0002 input and N/A output. Text Embedding 3 Small is 100.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Pixtral 12B has a 128K context window with ~200ms latency. Text Embedding 3 Small offers 8K context at ~10ms. Pixtral 12B has the larger context window.

Best For

Pixtral 12B (Vision) is optimized for: Simple image tasks, Classification, OCR. Text Embedding 3 Small (Embedding) works best for: Budget RAG, High-volume embedding, Simple search.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Pixtral 12B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="pixtral-12b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Text Embedding 3 Small
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="text-embedding-3-small",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral 12B or Text Embedding 3 Small?

Pixtral 12B (Vision, 12B) offers Low cost vision. Text Embedding 3 Small (Embedding, ~200M) offers Cheapest embedding. Choose Pixtral 12B for Simple image tasks or Text Embedding 3 Small for Budget RAG.

How much does Pixtral 12B cost vs Text Embedding 3 Small?

Pixtral 12B: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Text Embedding 3 Small: $0.0002/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Pixtral 12B and Text Embedding 3 Small by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Pixtral 12B vs Vedika Vision Pixtral 12B vs Text Embedding 3 Large Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.