Pixtral 12B vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

Compare Pixtral 12B and Cohere Rerank 3.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Pixtral 12B Cohere Rerank 3.5
CategoryVisionReranking
Parameters12B~600M
Context Window128K4K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.002/search/1M tokens
Output Price$0.04/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~25ms

Choose Pixtral 12B when:

  • ✓ Simple image tasks
  • ✓ Classification
  • ✓ OCR
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Fast, Compact

Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 when:

  • ✓ Search reranking
  • ✓ RAG improvement
  • ✓ Result quality
Key Strengths:

Higher quality, Multilingual, Fast

Verdict: Pixtral 12B vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

For cost efficiency, Cohere Rerank 3.5 wins at $0.002/search/1M input tokens. For speed, Pixtral 12B is faster at ~200ms. Pixtral 12B excels at Simple image tasks while Cohere Rerank 3.5 is better for Search reranking. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Pixtral 12B costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Cohere Rerank 3.5 costs $0.002/search input and N/A output. Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 10.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Pixtral 12B has a 128K context window with ~200ms latency. Cohere Rerank 3.5 offers 4K context at ~25ms. Pixtral 12B has the larger context window.

Best For

Pixtral 12B (Vision) is optimized for: Simple image tasks, Classification, OCR. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking) works best for: Search reranking, RAG improvement, Result quality.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Pixtral 12B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="pixtral-12b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Cohere Rerank 3.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="rerank-v3-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral 12B or Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Pixtral 12B (Vision, 12B) offers Low cost vision. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking, ~600M) offers Higher quality. Choose Pixtral 12B for Simple image tasks or Cohere Rerank 3.5 for Search reranking.

How much does Pixtral 12B cost vs Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Pixtral 12B: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Cohere Rerank 3.5: $0.002/search/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Pixtral 12B and Cohere Rerank 3.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Pixtral 12B vs Vedika Vision Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Pixtral 12B vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.