Pixtral 12B vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Pixtral 12B and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Pixtral 12B Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryVisionEmbedding
Parameters12B137M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.04/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~10ms

Choose Pixtral 12B when:

  • ✓ Simple image tasks
  • ✓ Classification
  • ✓ OCR
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Fast, Compact

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Pixtral 12B vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Pixtral 12B excels at Simple image tasks while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Pixtral 12B costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 20.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Pixtral 12B has a 128K context window with ~200ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Pixtral 12B has the larger context window.

Best For

Pixtral 12B (Vision) is optimized for: Simple image tasks, Classification, OCR. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Pixtral 12B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="pixtral-12b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pixtral 12B or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Pixtral 12B (Vision, 12B) offers Low cost vision. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Pixtral 12B for Simple image tasks or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Pixtral 12B cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Pixtral 12B: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Pixtral 12B and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Pixtral 12B vs Vedika Vision Pixtral 12B vs Text Embedding 3 Large Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.