Phi-4 vs Llama Guard 3 8B

Compare Phi-4 and Llama Guard 3 8B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Microsoft models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Phi-4 Llama Guard 3 8B
CategoryCompactSafety
Parameters14B8B
Context Window16K128K
Input Price$0.01/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~100ms~60ms

Choose Phi-4 when:

  • ✓ Edge deployments
  • ✓ Cost-sensitive apps
  • ✓ Classification
Key Strengths:

Very compact, Strong reasoning for size, Extremely low cost

Choose Llama Guard 3 8B when:

  • ✓ Content moderation
  • ✓ Safety filtering
  • ✓ Input validation
Key Strengths:

Safety classification, Fast, Open weights

Verdict: Phi-4 vs Llama Guard 3 8B

For cost efficiency, Llama Guard 3 8B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Phi-4 is faster at ~100ms. Phi-4 excels at Edge deployments while Llama Guard 3 8B is better for Content moderation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Phi-4 costs $0.01/1M input tokens and $0.02/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 3 8B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Both models are similarly priced. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Phi-4 has a 16K context window with ~100ms latency. Llama Guard 3 8B offers 128K context at ~60ms. Llama Guard 3 8B has the larger context window.

Best For

Phi-4 (Compact) is optimized for: Edge deployments, Cost-sensitive apps, Classification. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety) works best for: Content moderation, Safety filtering, Input validation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Phi-4
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="phi-4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama Guard 3 8B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-guard-3-8b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Phi-4 or Llama Guard 3 8B?

Phi-4 (Compact, 14B) offers Very compact. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety, 8B) offers Safety classification. Choose Phi-4 for Edge deployments or Llama Guard 3 8B for Content moderation.

How much does Phi-4 cost vs Llama Guard 3 8B?

Phi-4: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Llama Guard 3 8B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Phi-4 and Llama Guard 3 8B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Phi-4 vs GPT-4.1 Nano Phi-4 vs GPT-4o Mini Phi-4 vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Phi-4 vs Gemma 3 12B Phi-4 vs Gemma 3 4B Phi-4 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.