o3 Pro vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare o3 Pro and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All OpenAI models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature o3 Pro InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryReasoningVision
Parameters~1T78B
Context Window200K128K
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.60/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~5000ms~400ms

Choose o3 Pro when:

  • ✓ Research-grade reasoning
  • ✓ Mathematical proofs
  • ✓ Hardest problems
Key Strengths:

Deepest reasoning, Best for hard problems, Highest accuracy

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: o3 Pro vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, InternVL 2.5 78B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. o3 Pro excels at Research-grade reasoning while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

o3 Pro costs $0.15/1M input tokens and $0.60/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. InternVL 2.5 78B is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

o3 Pro has a 200K context window with ~5000ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. o3 Pro has the larger context window.

Best For

o3 Pro (Reasoning) is optimized for: Research-grade reasoning, Mathematical proofs, Hardest problems. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use o3 Pro
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="o3-pro",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, o3 Pro or InternVL 2.5 78B?

o3 Pro (Reasoning, ~1T) offers Deepest reasoning. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose o3 Pro for Research-grade reasoning or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does o3 Pro cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

o3 Pro: $0.15/1M input, $0.60/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between o3 Pro and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

o3 Pro vs Vedika Vision o3 Pro vs o3 o3 Pro vs o3 Mini o3 Pro vs o4-mini o3 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision o3 Pro vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.