Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs WizardLM 2 8x22B
Compare Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and WizardLM 2 8x22B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Nomic Embed Text v1.5 | WizardLM 2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Embedding | Open Source |
| Parameters | 137M | 176B (22B active) |
| Context Window | 8K | 65K |
| Input Price | $0.001/1M tokens | $0.04/1M tokens |
| Output Price | N/A/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~10ms | ~350ms |
Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:
- ✓ Long document embedding
- ✓ Semantic search
- ✓ Clustering
8K context, Very low cost, Fast
Choose WizardLM 2 8x22B when:
- ✓ Complex instructions
- ✓ Math tasks
- ✓ Structured output
Strong instruction following, Good math, MoE efficient
Verdict: Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs WizardLM 2 8x22B
For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 excels at Long document embedding while WizardLM 2 8x22B is better for Complex instructions. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. WizardLM 2 8x22B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 40.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Nomic Embed Text v1.5 has a 8K context window with ~10ms latency. WizardLM 2 8x22B offers 65K context at ~350ms. WizardLM 2 8x22B has the larger context window.
Best For
Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) is optimized for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source) works best for: Complex instructions, Math tasks, Structured output.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use WizardLM 2 8x22B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="wizardlm-2-8x22b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 or WizardLM 2 8x22B?
Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source, 176B (22B active)) offers Strong instruction following. Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding or WizardLM 2 8x22B for Complex instructions.
How much does Nomic Embed Text v1.5 cost vs WizardLM 2 8x22B?
Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. WizardLM 2 8x22B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and WizardLM 2 8x22B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.