Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs MythoMax 13B

Compare Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and MythoMax 13B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Nomic AI models All Gryphe models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Nomic Embed Text v1.5 MythoMax 13B
CategoryEmbeddingOpen Source
Parameters137M13B
Context Window8K4K
Input Price$0.001/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~10ms~100ms

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Choose MythoMax 13B when:

  • ✓ Story generation
  • ✓ Creative content
  • ✓ Interactive fiction
Key Strengths:

Creative writing, Roleplay, Narrative quality

Verdict: Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs MythoMax 13B

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, MythoMax 13B is faster at ~100ms. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 excels at Long document embedding while MythoMax 13B is better for Story generation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. MythoMax 13B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 10.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 has a 8K context window with ~10ms latency. MythoMax 13B offers 4K context at ~100ms. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 has the larger context window.

Best For

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) is optimized for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering. MythoMax 13B (Open Source) works best for: Story generation, Creative content, Interactive fiction.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use MythoMax 13B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="mythomax-13b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 or MythoMax 13B?

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. MythoMax 13B (Open Source, 13B) offers Creative writing. Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding or MythoMax 13B for Story generation.

How much does Nomic Embed Text v1.5 cost vs MythoMax 13B?

Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. MythoMax 13B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and MythoMax 13B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Text Embedding 3 Large Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Gemma 3 27B Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 4 Scout Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.