Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Molmo 72B

Compare Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and Molmo 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Nomic AI models All AI2 models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Nomic Embed Text v1.5 Molmo 72B
CategoryEmbeddingVision
Parameters137M72B
Context Window8K128K
Input Price$0.001/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~10ms~350ms

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Choose Molmo 72B when:

  • ✓ Visual grounding
  • ✓ Object detection
  • ✓ Research
Key Strengths:

Fully open, Good pointing/grounding, Transparent

Verdict: Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Molmo 72B

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 excels at Long document embedding while Molmo 72B is better for Visual grounding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. Molmo 72B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 40.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 has a 8K context window with ~10ms latency. Molmo 72B offers 128K context at ~350ms. Molmo 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) is optimized for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering. Molmo 72B (Vision) works best for: Visual grounding, Object detection, Research.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Molmo 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="molmo-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 or Molmo 72B?

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Molmo 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Fully open. Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding or Molmo 72B for Visual grounding.

How much does Nomic Embed Text v1.5 cost vs Molmo 72B?

Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Molmo 72B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Nomic Embed Text v1.5 and Molmo 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Vedika Vision Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Text Embedding 3 Large Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Nomic Embed Text v1.5 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.