Mistral Medium 3 vs Phi-4

Compare Mistral Medium 3 and Phi-4: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Microsoft models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Mistral Medium 3 Phi-4
CategoryOpen SourceCompact
Parameters70B14B
Context Window128K16K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~100ms

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • ✓ Production APIs
  • ✓ Template filling
  • ✓ General purpose
Key Strengths:

Good balance, Strong function calling, Reliable

Choose Phi-4 when:

  • ✓ Edge deployments
  • ✓ Cost-sensitive apps
  • ✓ Classification
Key Strengths:

Very compact, Strong reasoning for size, Extremely low cost

Verdict: Mistral Medium 3 vs Phi-4

For cost efficiency, Phi-4 wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Phi-4 is faster at ~100ms. Mistral Medium 3 excels at Production APIs while Phi-4 is better for Edge deployments. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Phi-4 costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Phi-4 is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Mistral Medium 3 has a 128K context window with ~300ms latency. Phi-4 offers 16K context at ~100ms. Mistral Medium 3 has the larger context window.

Best For

Mistral Medium 3 (Open Source) is optimized for: Production APIs, Template filling, General purpose. Phi-4 (Compact) works best for: Edge deployments, Cost-sensitive apps, Classification.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Mistral Medium 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="mistral-medium-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Phi-4
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="phi-4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or Phi-4?

Mistral Medium 3 (Open Source, 70B) offers Good balance. Phi-4 (Compact, 14B) offers Very compact. Choose Mistral Medium 3 for Production APIs or Phi-4 for Edge deployments.

How much does Mistral Medium 3 cost vs Phi-4?

Mistral Medium 3: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Phi-4: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Mistral Medium 3 and Phi-4 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-4.1 Nano Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-4o Mini Mistral Medium 3 vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Mistral Medium 3 vs Gemma 3 27B Mistral Medium 3 vs Gemma 3 12B Mistral Medium 3 vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.