Mistral Medium 3 vs Command A

Compare Mistral Medium 3 and Command A: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Mistral Medium 3 Command A
CategoryOpen SourceEnterprise
Parameters70B111B (37B active)
Context Window128K256K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.025/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~300ms

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • ✓ Production APIs
  • ✓ Template filling
  • ✓ General purpose
Key Strengths:

Good balance, Strong function calling, Reliable

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Verdict: Mistral Medium 3 vs Command A

For cost efficiency, Command A wins at $0.025/1M input tokens. For speed, Command A is faster at ~300ms. Mistral Medium 3 excels at Production APIs while Command A is better for Enterprise RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Command A costs $0.025 input and $0.10 output. Command A is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Mistral Medium 3 has a 128K context window with ~300ms latency. Command A offers 256K context at ~300ms. Command A has the larger context window.

Best For

Mistral Medium 3 (Open Source) is optimized for: Production APIs, Template filling, General purpose. Command A (Enterprise) works best for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Mistral Medium 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="mistral-medium-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Command A
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or Command A?

Mistral Medium 3 (Open Source, 70B) offers Good balance. Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. Choose Mistral Medium 3 for Production APIs or Command A for Enterprise RAG.

How much does Mistral Medium 3 cost vs Command A?

Mistral Medium 3: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Mistral Medium 3 and Command A by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Mistral Medium 3 vs Gemma 3 27B Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Scout Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 3.1 405B Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 3.1 70B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.