Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Compare Llama 4 Scout and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 4 Scout Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
CategoryOpen SourceVision
Parameters109B (17B active)72B
Context Window512K128K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~350ms~400ms

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Long content
  • ✓ Multi-turn
Key Strengths:

512K context, MoE efficiency, Strong multilingual

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 4 Scout is faster at ~350ms. Llama 4 Scout excels at Classical text analysis while Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. Both models are similarly priced. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 4 Scout has a 512K context window with ~350ms latency. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source) is optimized for: Classical text analysis, Long content, Multi-turn. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 4 Scout
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-4-scout",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source, 109B (17B active)) offers 512K context. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Choose Llama 4 Scout for Classical text analysis or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis.

How much does Llama 4 Scout cost vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.05/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 4 Scout vs Vedika Vision Llama 4 Scout vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.1 405B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.1 70B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.