Llama 4 Scout vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Llama 4 Scout and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 4 Scout Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryOpen SourceEmbedding
Parameters109B (17B active)137M
Context Window512K8K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~350ms~10ms

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Long content
  • ✓ Multi-turn
Key Strengths:

512K context, MoE efficiency, Strong multilingual

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Llama 4 Scout excels at Classical text analysis while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 50.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 4 Scout has a 512K context window with ~350ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source) is optimized for: Classical text analysis, Long content, Multi-turn. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 4 Scout
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-4-scout",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source, 109B (17B active)) offers 512K context. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Llama 4 Scout for Classical text analysis or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Llama 4 Scout cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.05/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 4 Scout and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 4 Scout vs Text Embedding 3 Large Llama 4 Scout vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.1 405B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.1 70B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.