Llama 4 Scout vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra

Compare Llama 4 Scout and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Black Forest Labs models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 4 Scout FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
CategoryOpen SourceImage
Parameters109B (17B active)~30B
Context Window512KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.06/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~350ms~6s

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Long content
  • ✓ Multi-turn
Key Strengths:

512K context, MoE efficiency, Strong multilingual

Choose FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra when:

  • ✓ Print-quality imagery
  • ✓ Ultra-HD content
  • ✓ Professional art
Key Strengths:

Ultra quality, 4K output, Best detail

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra

For cost efficiency, Llama 4 Scout wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 4 Scout is faster at ~350ms. Llama 4 Scout excels at Classical text analysis while FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra is better for Print-quality imagery. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra costs $0.06/image input and N/A output. Llama 4 Scout is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 4 Scout has a 512K context window with ~350ms latency. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra offers N/A context at ~6s. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source) is optimized for: Classical text analysis, Long content, Multi-turn. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image) works best for: Print-quality imagery, Ultra-HD content, Professional art.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 4 Scout
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-4-scout",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="flux-1-1-pro-ultra",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?

Llama 4 Scout (Open Source, 109B (17B active)) offers 512K context. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (Image, ~30B) offers Ultra quality. Choose Llama 4 Scout for Classical text analysis or FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra for Print-quality imagery.

How much does Llama 4 Scout cost vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.05/1M input, $0.08/1M output. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: $0.06/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 4 Scout and FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 4 Scout vs DALL-E 3 Llama 4 Scout vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 4 Scout vs Imagen 3 Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.