Llama 4 Maverick vs FLUX 1.1 Pro

Compare Llama 4 Maverick and FLUX 1.1 Pro: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Black Forest Labs models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 4 Maverick FLUX 1.1 Pro
CategoryOpen SourceImage
Parameters400B (17B active)24B
Context Window256KN/A
Input Price$0.07/1M tokens$0.05/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.12/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~450ms~4s

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • ✓ Complex analysis
  • ✓ Professional reports
  • ✓ Deep reasoning
Key Strengths:

Superior reasoning, 256K context, Excellent multilingual

Choose FLUX 1.1 Pro when:

  • ✓ Premium marketing
  • ✓ Temple artwork
  • ✓ Product photography
Key Strengths:

Highest quality, Best prompt adherence, Professional grade

Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick vs FLUX 1.1 Pro

For cost efficiency, FLUX 1.1 Pro wins at $0.05/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 4 Maverick is faster at ~450ms. Llama 4 Maverick excels at Complex analysis while FLUX 1.1 Pro is better for Premium marketing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.07/1M input tokens and $0.12/1M output tokens. FLUX 1.1 Pro costs $0.05/image input and N/A output. FLUX 1.1 Pro is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 4 Maverick has a 256K context window with ~450ms latency. FLUX 1.1 Pro offers N/A context at ~4s. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 4 Maverick (Open Source) is optimized for: Complex analysis, Professional reports, Deep reasoning. FLUX 1.1 Pro (Image) works best for: Premium marketing, Temple artwork, Product photography.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 4 Maverick
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-4-maverick",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use FLUX 1.1 Pro
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="flux-1-1-pro",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or FLUX 1.1 Pro?

Llama 4 Maverick (Open Source, 400B (17B active)) offers Superior reasoning. FLUX 1.1 Pro (Image, 24B) offers Highest quality. Choose Llama 4 Maverick for Complex analysis or FLUX 1.1 Pro for Premium marketing.

How much does Llama 4 Maverick cost vs FLUX 1.1 Pro?

Llama 4 Maverick: $0.07/1M input, $0.12/1M output. FLUX 1.1 Pro: $0.05/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 4 Maverick and FLUX 1.1 Pro by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 4 Maverick vs DALL-E 3 Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 4 Maverick vs Imagen 3 Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.