Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
CategoryVisionVision
Parameters90B72B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~400ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral Large Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral 12B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.