Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo
CategoryVisionOpen Source
Parameters90B72B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~300ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo when:

  • ✓ Pan-India apps
  • ✓ Multilingual Q&A
  • ✓ Content generation
Key Strengths:

Strong Asian languages, Good reasoning, Fast inference

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo

For cost efficiency, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo is faster at ~300ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo is better for Pan-India apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo offers 128K context at ~300ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source) works best for: Pan-India apps, Multilingual Q&A, Content generation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-72b-turbo",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Open Source, 72B) offers Strong Asian languages. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo for Pan-India apps.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 4 Scout Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.