Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Nomic Embed Text v1.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Nomic AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Nomic Embed Text v1.5
CategoryVisionEmbedding
Parameters90B137M
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~10ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Nomic Embed Text v1.5 when:

  • ✓ Long document embedding
  • ✓ Semantic search
  • ✓ Clustering
Key Strengths:

8K context, Very low cost, Fast

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5

For cost efficiency, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is faster at ~10ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is better for Long document embedding. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 is 60.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 offers 8K context at ~10ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding) works best for: Long document embedding, Semantic search, Clustering.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nomic Embed Text v1.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nomic-embed-text-v1-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Nomic Embed Text v1.5 (Embedding, 137M) offers 8K context. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Nomic Embed Text v1.5 for Long document embedding.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Nomic Embed Text v1.5: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Nomic Embed Text v1.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Text Embedding 3 Large Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.