Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Jamba 1.5 Mini: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All AI21 models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Jamba 1.5 Mini
CategoryVisionCompact
Parameters90B52B (12B active)
Context Window128K256K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~200ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini when:

  • ✓ Long document Q&A
  • ✓ Budget apps
  • ✓ Summarization
Key Strengths:

256K context, Low cost, SSM efficiency

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

For cost efficiency, Jamba 1.5 Mini wins at $0.02/1M input tokens. For speed, Jamba 1.5 Mini is faster at ~200ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Jamba 1.5 Mini is better for Long document Q&A. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini costs $0.02 input and $0.04 output. Jamba 1.5 Mini is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 256K context at ~200ms. Jamba 1.5 Mini has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Jamba 1.5 Mini (Compact) works best for: Long document Q&A, Budget apps, Summarization.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Jamba 1.5 Mini
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="jamba-1-5-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Jamba 1.5 Mini (Compact, 52B (12B active)) offers 256K context. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Jamba 1.5 Mini for Long document Q&A.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Jamba 1.5 Mini: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Jamba 1.5 Mini by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs GPT-4.1 Nano Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs GPT-4o Mini Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Gemma 3 12B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.